Home » Trials » SLCTR/2026/002


Effectiveness of the Instructional Sequence of Role Play and Lecture versus Lecture and Role Play in Developing Health Communication Competence in managing aggressive patients empathetically among Nurses: A Hospital-Based Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial

-

SLCTR Registration Number

SLCTR/2026/002


Date of Registration

27 Jan 2026

The date of last modification

Jan 27, 2026



Application Summary


Scientific Title of Trial

Effectiveness of the Instructional Sequence of Role Play and Lecture versus Lecture and Role Play in Developing Health Communication Competence in managing aggressive patients empathetically among Nurses: A Hospital-Based Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial


Public Title of Trial

Effectiveness of the using Role Play followed by Lecture versus Lecture followed by Role Play in Developing Health Communication Competence in managing aggressive patients empathetically by Nurses: A Hospital-Based Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial


Disease or Health Condition(s) Studied

Communication competence in the management of aggressive patient behaviour


Scientific Acronym

None


Public Acronym

None


Brief title

None


Universal Trial Number

U1111-1333-4201


Any other number(s) assigned to the trial and issuing authority

REC/25-014 (Research Ethics Committee, Sri Lanka Medical Association)


Trial Details


What is the research question being addressed?

What is the most effective instructional sequence, lecture followed by role play versus role play followed by lecture for developing nurses’ health communication competence in managing aggressive patients empathetically during a single teaching and learning session in a selected tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka?


Type of study

Interventional


Study design

Allocation

Randomized controlled trial


Masking

Single blinded : Outcome assessors


Control

Active


Assignment

Parallel


Purpose

Health services research


Study Phase

Not Applicable


Intervention(s) planned

Study Setting
This single-site trial will be conducted at the Faculty of Nursing, University of Colombo in collaboration with Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital (SJGH). Participants will be recruited from SJGH, while all teaching sessions and assessments will be conducted at the Faculty of Nursing.

Randomisation
Sample size was determined using G*Power software. Randomization will be used to allocate 40 eligible participants equally (1:1) to either the intervention group (role play followed by lecture) or the comparator group (lecture followed by role play) – twenty participants per each group, ensuring equal probability of assignment and minimising selection bias. An independent statistician, not involved in recruitment, intervention delivery, or outcome assessment, will generate the random allocation sequence using a computerized random number generator in Microsoft Excel. The allocation sequence will be securely stored and concealed from the research team to preserve methodological rigour and prevent bias.

Allocation concealment
Allocation concealment will be ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) prepared in advance according to the randomization list generated by an independent statistician. Each envelope will be opened only after written informed consent and completion of baseline (pre-test) assessments, by an independent research assistant not involved in other study procedures. The Principal Investigator will have no prior access to the allocation list and will be informed of group assignment only after enrolment. All steps related to envelope preparation, handling, and opening will be fully documented to maintain transparency and prevent allocation bias.

Blinding
Outcome assessors for MCQs and OSCEs will be blinded to group allocation. Due to the educational nature of the intervention, the Principal Investigator, facilitator, and participants will not be blinded.

Role Play - Lecture Sequence (Intervention Arm)

Participants in the intervention arm will receive an expert-validated, four-and-a-half-hour structured teaching session comprising the following components:

1. Introduction (10 minutes).
2. Instructional videos (15 minutes), consisting of two custom-selected videos developed by DBSAlliance (July 7, 2015) and Chris Hart (September 16, 2015).
3. Role-play demonstration (15 minutes), during which trained assistants will demonstrate a purpose-developed simulated nurse–patient interaction focusing on the empathetic management of aggressive behaviour.
4. Paired role-play practice (30 minutes), in which participants will practise de-escalation and therapeutic communication skills using a second scenario.
5. Feedback session (20 minutes), incorporating guided peer and facilitator feedback.
6. Lecture (60 minutes) developed based on nurses’ learning needs identified in earlier phases of the study and supported by relevant literature.

The session will be facilitated by a qualified nurse educator with more than five years of experience in teaching communication skills and a master’s degree in nursing. The same facilitator will deliver all components to ensure standardisation across the intervention.

Lecture–Role Play Sequence (Comparator Arm)

Participants in the comparator arm will receive an expert-validated, four-and-a-half-hour structured teaching session identical in content and duration to the intervention arm, differing only in the instructional sequence. The session will be conducted on the same day as the intervention arm following a 30-minute break.

1. Introduction (10 minutes).
2. Lecture (60 minutes) developed based on nurses’ learning needs identified in earlier phases of the study and supported by relevant literature.
3. Instructional videos (15 minutes), consisting of two custom-selected videos developed by DBSAlliance (July 7, 2015) and Chris Hart (September 16, 2015).
4. Role-play demonstration (15 minutes), during which the facilitator will demonstrate a purpose-developed simulated nurse–patient interaction using trained assistants, focusing on the empathetic management of aggressive behaviour.
5. Paired role-play practice (30 minutes), in which participants will practise de-escalation and therapeutic communication skills using a second scenario.
6. Feedback session (20 minutes), incorporating structured peer and facilitator feedback consistent with the intervention arm.

The same qualified nurse educator with more than five years of experience in teaching communication skills and a master’s degree in nursing will facilitate all components to ensure standardisation.

Outcome assessment will be conducted using pre-test and post-test MCQs and OSCEs at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention, and at one-month follow-up to assess both immediate and retained improvements in health communication competence.


Inclusion criteria

• Registered nurse currently working in a clinical setting at SJGH.
• Minimum of one year of continuous employment at SJGH.
• Actively engaged in patient care activities during the study period.
• Nurses of any age (no age restrictions)
• Both male and female nurses
• Willing to participate in the full intervention programme (4 and half hours) and follow-up assessments.


Exclusion criteria

• Currently on extended leave (e.g., maternity leave, long-term medical leave).
• Nurses primarily engaged in administrative or non-clinical roles (e.g., nurse educators, ward managers with no direct patient contact).
• Prior participation in similar health communication training within the last 6 months.
• Inability to commit to both pre-test and post-test assessments due to shift constraints.
• Nurses who participated in earlier phases of this research study (i.e., Phase I or II of the exploratory study) (to avoid response bias and prior exposure effects that may influence the outcomes.)



Primary outcome(s)

1.

The primary outcome of this study is the effectiveness of the instructional sequence of lecture followed by role play versus role play followed by lecture for a single teaching and learning session on nurses’ health communication competence in managing aggressive patients empathetically in a selected tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.

The effectiveness of the instructional sequence will be measured by the immediate change in health communication competence in managing aggressive patients among nurses following the teaching–learning intervention.

Health communication competence will be measured using:

1.Health Communication Knowledge
o Tool: 30 Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) test
o Scoring: Total score based on correct answers
o Purpose: To assess theoretical knowledge on
empathetic communication in managing aggressive patients

2.Health Communication Skills
o Tool: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)
o Scoring: Predefined structured checklist focusing on:
- Empathetic communication
- De-escalation skills
- Active listening
- Verbal and non-verbal communication
o Purpose: To assess observed communication performance

• MCQs will be scored by research assistants blinded to group allocation
• OSCEs will be assessed by trained independent examiners blinded to group allocation
• All assessments will be conducted at the Faculty of Nursing, University of Colombo, under controlled and standardized conditions

Analysis Metric for Each Participant
• Change in MCQ score = Post-test – Pre-test
• Change in OSCE score = Post-test – Pre-test

Summary Measure for Each Study Group
• Mean change in MCQ scores (RL vs LR)
• Mean change in OSCE scores (RL vs LR)

Analysis Strategy

The difference in mean health communication competence between the two groups across pre-test and post-test will be compared using Mixed (Factorial) ANOVA to determine the effect of instructional sequence

[

Time Points of Assessment
• Baseline: Pre-intervention (MCQ + OSCE)
• Immediate post-intervention: Immediately after the teaching session (MCQ + OSCE)

]

Secondary outcome(s)

1.

Secondary outcome of this study is Post One-month change in Health Communication Competence in managing aggressive patients among nurses following the teaching–learning intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measurement Health communication competence following one month will be measured using the same objective tools as the primary outcome:

1.Health Communication Knowledge
o Tool: 30-item Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) test
o Outcome measure: Total MCQ score

2.Health Communication Skills
o Tool: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)
o Outcome measure: Total OSCE score based on a standardized checklist

• MCQs will be scored by research assistants blinded to group allocation
• OSCEs will be assessed by trained independent examiners blinded to group allocation
• All assessments will be conducted at the Faculty of Nursing, University of Colombo, under standardized conditions

Summary Measure for Each Study Group
• Mean change in MCQ scores from post-test to one-month follow-up (RL vs. LR)
• Mean change in OSCE scores from post-test to one-month follow-up (RL vs. LR)

Analysis Strategy
The difference in mean health communication competence between the two groups across post-test and one-month follow-up will be compared using Mixed (Factorial) ANOVA to determine whether the instructional sequence has a differential sustained effect.

[

Time Point of Assessment • Follow-up: One month after the intervention (MCQ + OSCE)

]

Target number/sample size

40 participants (20 per group)


Countries of recruitment

Sri Lanka


Anticipated start date

2026-02-01


Anticipated end date

2026-04-01


Date of first enrollment


Date of study completion


Recruitment status

Pending


Funding source

None (Investigator funded)


Regulatory approvals

Not applicable



State of Ethics Review Approval


Status

Approved


Date of Approval

2025-11-21


Approval number

REC/25-014


Details of Ethics Review Committee

Name: Sri Lanka Medical Association
Institutional Address:No.06, Wijerama Mawatha, Colombo 07, Sri Lanka
Telephone:T.P. No - 0112693324
Email: erc.slma@gmail.com

Contact & Sponsor Information


Contact person for Scientific Queries/Principal Investigator

Ms .Shereen Senarathne
Lecturer
Faculty of Nursing, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
0112778298
0766221355
Not available
shereensenarathne@dcn.cmb.ac.lk
https://nursing.cmb.ac.lk

Contact Person for Public Queries

Prof.SSP Warnakulasuriya
Dean
Faculty of Nursing, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
0112778298
0769928636
Not available
dean@nursing.cmb.ac.lk
https://nursing.cmb.ac.lk


Primary study sponsor/organization

Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

35/30, Prof. Stanley Wijesundara Mawatha, Colombo 07, Sri Lanka
(+94) 011 205 56 56, (+94) 0112502127
(+94) 011 25 91 395
office@fgs.cmb.ac.lk
https://fgs.cmb.ac.lk

Secondary study sponsor (If any)

None





Trial Completion details


Do the investigators plan to share identified individual clinical trial participant-level data (IPD)?

Yes


IPD sharing plan description

De-identified individual participant data, including socio-demographic information, MCQ scores, and OSCE scores, will be shared. In addition, the study protocol, data collection sheets, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form will be made available. Data will be accessible immediately following publication and will remain available for a period of five years. Access to the data will be granted to researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal and intend to use the data to address the objectives of the approved research, within five years of study completion. Data requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator via email at shereensenarathne@dcn.cmb.ac.lk.


Study protocol available

Yes


Protocol version and date

Version 2 - 31.10.2025 (ERC), SLMA


Protocol URL


Results summary available

No


Date of posting results


Date of study completion


Final sample size


Date of first publication


Link to results


Brief summary of results