Home » Trials » SLCTR/2026/015


Comparing the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Methylprednisolone in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients at National Hospital, Galle: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

-

SLCTR Registration Number

SLCTR/2026/015


Date of Registration

26 Jun 2026

The date of last modification

Jun 26, 2026



Application Summary


Scientific Title of Trial

Comparing the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Methylprednisolone in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients at National Hospital, Galle: A Randomized Controlled Trial.


Public Title of Trial

Comparing the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Methylprednisolone in the Intra-lesional Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients at National Hospital, Galle: A randomized clinical trial


Disease or Health Condition(s) Studied

Oral Submucous Fibrosis


Scientific Acronym

None


Public Acronym

None


Brief title

None


Universal Trial Number

U1111-1334-4134


Any other number(s) assigned to the trial and issuing authority

2024/P/081(05.12.2024)


Trial Details


What is the research question being addressed?

Is there a difference in the comparative efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Methylprednisolone in the intra-lesional management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF) Patients?


Type of study

Interventional


Study design

Allocation

Randomized controlled trial


Masking

Masking not used


Control

Standard therapy/practice


Assignment

Parallel


Purpose

Treatment


Study Phase

Phase 3


Intervention(s) planned

  1. Study setting - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Unit at National Hospital, Galle

  2. Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned using a simple random sampling method rather than convenient sampling. A computer-generated randomization sequence with a 1:1 allocation ratio will be prepared by an independent statistician not involved in participant recruitment or intervention delivery. Allocation concealment will be ensured using Sequentially Numbered, Opaque, Sealed Envelopes (SNOSE). Each envelope will contain the group assignment and will be opened sequentially by the Principal Investigator only after obtaining informed consent and enrolling the participant into the study. This process will prevent selection bias and ensure proper allocation concealment.

  3. Intervention Group A: (Standard therapy) The standard therapy is used as the control group in the beginning. Control group treatment procedure - 1ml methyl prednisolone + 0.5ml lignocaine with adrenaline 1:80,000 will be mixed together and injected to fibrous bands of patients. Lignocaine will be added to reduce pain. 1ml of methyl prednisolone solution contains 40 mg of methyl prednisolone.

Group B: Patients will receive intra-lesional injections of PRP at baseline and then at 2-weeks intervals for three months of six cycles.

Group B. 18ml of blood will be drawn for preparation of PRP with 2ml citrate solution for the patients in the intervention group. The blood will be mixed with 2 ml of citrate dextrose solution (an anticoagulant agent) and processed in a centrifuge machine for 6 minutes at a speed of 3200 Rpm. The same person will draw blood from all the participants assigned to Group B to minimize bias. Approximately 10ml of PRP will be produced by 18ml of blood. PRP will be prepared at each 2 weekly visits of each patient. It is not done only once and the PRP sample will not be preserved for future administrations

The intra-lesional injections will be administered by a qualified staff member attached to the Oral and Maxillofacial unit at National Hospital Galle. The same person will be administering injections for all the participants of the trial to minimize bias.

Since the participants will not be blinded, the care of participants such as giving habit cessation advice and strict oral hygiene improvement, frequency of follow-up and management of complications will be standardized for both groups.


Inclusion criteria

Age 18-65 years and any gender Clinically and histologically confirmed Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF) Stage 2 (moderate OSMF cases with mouth opening between 20mm and 35mm) No prior Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF) treatment


Exclusion criteria

Patients with coagulation disorders History of allergy to corticosteroids or PRP Pregnant or lactating women Patients currently undergoing treatment for Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF)



Primary outcome(s)

1.

Improvement in mouth opening (measured precisely as the change in maximum inter-incisal distance in millimeters with a Vernier caliper).

[

Baseline assessment and follow-up assessments will be carried out at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

]

Secondary outcome(s)

1.

Reduction in pain - The following Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which is a validated tool to measure pain will be used. A horizontal line which is 100mm in length will be used with attached to word descriptions at each end; “Not hurting” or “no pain” to “hurting a whole lot” or “severe pain”. The patients will be asked to mark the line point with “X” at the point that they feel represents their pain at that moment. The pain severity will be determined by measuring the distance from the left end of the line to the “X” in mm.”

[

Baseline assessment and follow-up assessments will be carried out at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

]
2.

Patient satisfaction: A horizontal line of 100-mm long will be used for this purpose. At the beginning and at the end, there will be two descriptors representing extremes of satisfaction (i.e. no satisfaction and extreme satisfaction). The patient will be requested to rate his/her satisfaction by making a vertical mark on the 100-mm line. The measurement in millimetres will be converted to the same number of points ranging from 0 to 100 points. The exact question will be “Are you satisfied with your treatment?” A standard explanation of how to fill in the VAS form will be mentioned beneath the VAS horizontal line.

[

Baseline assessment and follow-up assessments will be carried out at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

]
3.

Reduction in burning sensation (Visual Analogue Scale scores)

[

Baseline assessment and follow-up assessments will be carried out at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

]
4.

Burning sensation (Visual Analogue Scale scores)

[

Baseline assessment and follow-up assessments will be carried out at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

]

Target number/sample size

24 in each arm


Countries of recruitment

Sri Lanka


Anticipated start date

2026-07-01


Anticipated end date

2026-12-31


Date of first enrollment


Date of study completion


Recruitment status

Pending


Funding source

Self-funded


Regulatory approvals

Pending



State of Ethics Review Approval


Status

Approved


Date of Approval

2025-07-31


Approval number

2024/P/081(05.12.2024)


Details of Ethics Review Committee

Name: Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna
Institutional Address:Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna
Telephone:The Administrative Officer Office: 0912232288 Ext: 161
Email: ethics@med.ruh.ac.lk

Contact & Sponsor Information


Contact person for Scientific Queries/Principal Investigator

Dr. Dayanath Kumara Dias
Consultant in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
National Hospital Galle, Sri Lanka
-
0777801859
-
dkdias@sltnet.lk
-

Contact Person for Public Queries

Dr. Dayanath Kumara Dias
Consultant in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
National Hospital Galle, Sri Lanka
-
0777801859
-
dkdias@sltnet.lk
-


Primary study sponsor/organization

Dr. Dayanath Kumara Dias
Consultant in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
National Hospital Galle, Sri Lanka
0777801859
-
dkdias@sltnet.lk
-

Secondary study sponsor (If any)

None
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Trial Completion details


Do the investigators plan to share identified individual clinical trial participant-level data (IPD)?

No


IPD sharing plan description

N/A


Study protocol available

No


Protocol version and date

Not Available


Protocol URL

Not Available


Results summary available

No


Date of posting results


Date of study completion


Final sample size


Date of first publication


Link to results


Brief summary of results